Radiologist-Missed Spinal Tumor Found by Chiropractor
This compelling case study follows a 36-year-old female who presented with lumbar pain and radiculopathy, leading her chiropractor to order an immediate MRI. Upon reviewing the images, the chiropractor identified a "massive" intradural mass spanning L2 to L4—a finding later confirmed by a medical neuroradiologist as a probable ependymoma. Despite the severity, the formal radiology report from a general radiologist completely omitted the lesion, erroneously dismissing it as a motion artifact. The chiropractor had to confront the radiologist to force an addendum, highlighting a dangerous gap in diagnostic accuracy when specialized interpretive protocols are ignored.
The sources argue that this case exposes a significant professional double standard regarding diagnostic accountability. If a chiropractor had missed such a pathology, it would likely be framed as a systemic failure in their training; however, when a medical specialist fails, the narrative is often different. This article emphasizes that specialized training and disciplined observation matter more than professional titles. By identifying high-risk pathology early, the chiropractor in this case likely prevented dire outcomes for the patient, reinforcing the vital role advanced imaging education plays in chiropractic practice and patient safety.
The sources argue that this case exposes a significant professional double standard regarding diagnostic accountability. If a chiropractor had missed such a pathology, it would likely be framed as a systemic failure in their training; however, when a medical specialist fails, the narrative is often different. This article emphasizes that specialized training and disciplined observation matter more than professional titles. By identifying high-risk pathology early, the chiropractor in this case likely prevented dire outcomes for the patient, reinforcing the vital role advanced imaging education plays in chiropractic practice and patient safety.
