Explaining the lack of causation between cervical manipulative therapy (CMT) and stroke to a layperson can be challenging. This article introduces the "Ice Cream Analogy" as a tool for chiropractors and legal defense teams to clarify the difference between association and causation. The analogy points out that while there is a statistical association between ice cream consumption and drowning, ice cream does not cause drowning; rather, the confounding factor of warm summer weather leads people to both eat ice cream and swim more often.

Similarly, while some studies show an association between CMT and cervical arterial dissections (CAD), this is often a case of reverse causation. Patients experiencing the early stages of a dissection-related stroke often present with neck pain or headaches, leading them to seek care from either a chiropractor or a primary care physician just before the stroke occurs. Because visits to both types of providers show similar associations with subsequent stroke, the visit itself likely reflects the patient seeking help for existing symptoms rather than the provider causing the injury. Utilizing this analogy helps set the record straight against anti-chiropractic groups that attempt to blur these legal and clinical lines.